Propagating your genes versus propagating your ixperiencitness argument

Which is better propagating your genes into people that do not have your ixperiencitness or having other genes that are not all yours produce consciousness that you do experience? Most of the genes that a person propagates are very much like other peoples genes. The children that you have get half from the mother and half from the father. At best you propagate half of your divergent genes and the rest are genes that you have in common with other people.

You may know if you are propagating your genes, but at this stage in the development of science you can't know if you are propagating your ixperiencitness in another person through your genes. Your current set of genes was helpful in producing your ixperiencitness. If the conditions of your life would have been different enough your body may not have produced your ixperiencitness. Since the ixperiencitness concept is a continuum like concept it is possible that your set of genes when applied to a different set of life conditions would produce only a percentage wise equality in the ixperiencitness. Another person's set of genes when having the right environmental conditions could produce an ixperiencitness closer to your ixperiencitness than many of your gene based possible bodies.

Genetic enhancements of biological bodies needs other genes or the addition of other genes.

Electronic conscious bodies do not need biological genes to produce ixperiencitness.

Your enemies, aliens etc., can produce your ixperiencitness without your unique set of genes.

Ixpepaducers, Awarepaducers, and physapaducers do not need whole or even partial biological bodies to produce ixperiencitnesses.

The passing on of your genes is not necessary for you to experience conscious existence again after the death of your biological body ---- superimmortality.