Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Analogy for "its not me" argument

From Aware Theory
Revision as of 19:56, 17 June 2018 by Mark (talk | contribs) (Created page with "It is said that another body producing an identical physapath, identical consciousness and identical ixperiencitness is still not you. This is like saying that a s...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

It is said that another body producing an identical physapath, identical consciousness and identical ixperiencitness is still not you. This is like saying that a song played on another iPhone identically is not the same song. Or a movie played in another theater is not the same movie. We can have identity we can have identity of parts of concepts ideas things etc. with out having identity of the whole. We can have identity of structure and functioning without having identity of the bodies that produce the structure and functioning. We can have identity of tv shows with out having identity of TVs sets. We can have identity of a color, like red, with out having identity of the object that has this color. There can also be partial identity of TV shows, colors, structure and functioning of an object, ixperiencitness, consciousness, behavior, etc.

When you have identity of ixperiencitness among two or more consciousnesses whether the consciousness are identical or not, no matter how these consciousnesses are produced, you experience these consciousnesses.