Ch7oricit.expri
More actions
File name ch7ori/cit.ex/pri.cor/vid File created date11:50 am Friday, May 9 2008
Citodivergence Citophysidivergence Citoawaredivergence
Citoconvergence Citophysiconvergence Citoawareconvergence
Citomultivergence Citomultiphysivergence Citomultiawarevergence
Citosimiconvergence Citosimiphysiconvergence Citosimiawareconvergence
Citosimidivergence Citosimiphysidivergence Citosimiawaredivergence
Citosimimultivergence Citosimimultiphysivergence Citosimiawaremultivergence
Why use the term simi rather than the term semi as a prefix meaning partial? The two words sound the same. There might be confusion between the term semi as part of a tractor trailer when applied to the semipath as a path or route of a semi truck. There is also the association to the term similar. Not only is the simipath a partial path it is also a similar path. A similar path is a partially alike path. And also the term simpler can be applied as well. So similar, simpler, partial (semi)-- simi. Also too many words start with semi. I liked the spelling better after misspelling semi as simi. Probably was always taken subconsciously from the word similar
Oridivergence
Discussion: Oridivergence is the basis of the concept of conciable originals or coriginals.
Question(s): Can potential physipaths and potential awarepaths diverge?
Definition: Oridivergence is the term that concerns the divergence or changing of the original awarepath and physipath
Experiment set# Oridivergence: since we have only one original it is hard to do experiments with only the original when compared to itself. But we can ask what will be the consciousness of the original when when we change the sensepath enviropath of the orignal. There are a very large amount of different sensepath that can change the physipath of the original.
The original can be different in many different ways. When the original is different than it actually is it is a form of oridivergence. Each individual person (original) can look at the present and see how many different ways that he can do things from this moment on. Each different way is actually you but a version of you. We call these versions of you conceivable originals or coriginals. In this experiment we want to know will a divergent original still be you; will it have your consciousness? Will it have your ixperiencit? We can start with the simplest of experiments such as interchanging two different types of molecules in your body. We have a different physipath do we have a different consciousness or awarepath? Usually such a small change will not produce a change in consciousness. If enough change in structure or functioning of the body is produced a change in consciousness will be produced or will eventually be produced. Where the replacement of a calcium atom with a sodium atom amy not produce any major changes in the functioning of the body and no change in the consciousness the removal of a large part of the brain will produce a difference in consciousness. There is always the chance that a very small change in functioning and structure will avalanche into a large change in consciousness.
Can the original be different that it in fact was? Can the original actually go down different paths of structure, functioning, consciousness, etc. or is it bound to only one path? We do believe that we do have the option to be different from what we are. This does not necessary reflect on free will. We do not need free will to have the universe create different conditions. Can the conditions in the universe be different? Does the universe have the ability to create a different set of conditions than in fact happened? If the conditions in the universe were different enough would we have a different physipaths or awarepath for the original? If the conditions for divergence existed then the original would have had a different physipath and awarepath.
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence: We believe that if we do something other than what we do or did our experiences will be differnt. If we actually believed that nothing that we do now will make any difference to what we will expereince in the future we would not bother to do anything. There is a great deal of evidence
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT: Most theories accept that given a diffent sensepath the consciousness of the original would have been differnt or could be differnt tha it is.
Principle of Oridivergence: The original could have been different than it was physically and consciously if conditions such as the sensepath, externalpath and internal path, were different.
CAM/VT analogy Oridivergence:
Subjective (ixperiencit) example: If I poke myself in the hand with a sharp knife I believe it will hurt so even though it is a possibility, it is one I will not easily choose. I can imagine the pain. I can also imagine the lack of pain if I do not do that. This is one of numerous things that I can imgine could happen but will not
Why/how Important?:
Citodivergence
Discussion: Citodivergence is the basis for the concept of variation in the cidentireplica or the concept of videntireplicas.
Question(s): Can the cidentireplica at any point on its awarepath, that is identical to the awarepath of the original, diverge from that of the original?
Definition: Citodivergence
Experiment set# Citodivergence:
This experiment set is so self evident that it is almost not worth setting up an experiment for. The questions is: Can a cidentireplica diverge in functioning and mentality from that of the original? Up to this point it has been by definition that the cidentireplica did not diverge in spite of the fact that under normal circumstances it would very easily have done so. Cidentireplicas will more easily diverge than stay identical to the functioning of the original. Citodivergence is a term that means the divergence of functioning structure and or consciousness of the cidentireplica from the functioning structure and or consciousness of the original. The consciousness produced can also diverge from the consciousness of the originals. Of course once a cidentireplica diverges from the identical functioning of the original it is no longer a cidentireplica. Since a cidentireplica is no longer a cidentireplica of a particular original when it diverges we have to rename this diverging or varying body. Since it is no longer continuing to be the same but varying we change the first letter from a “c” to a “v” and have the new word videntireplica. A videntireplica is a varying or diverging identireplica. There are numerous reasons and ways that a cidentireplica’s functioning can diverge from that of an original’s. This can happen for any number of different reasons. If there is enough change in the functioning, there will be a change in the consciousness produced by this videntireplica which is no longer a cidentireplica of that original. It is possible that this former cidentireplica is now a cidentireplica of a different original or is producing consciousness that has never existed before i.e., a unique original. In what ways can a cidentireplica diverge? These are some possible ways: Physical divergence with out mental divergence (physipath divergence with out mentapath divergence). Physical divergence with mental divergence (physipath divergence and mentapath divergence). Physical divergence with mental divergence with divergence of awareness (physipath, mentapath, awarepath divergence) and physipath mentapath awarepath and selfawarepath divergence. What can cause this divergence? Difference in the senses (different sensepath), direct effect to the brain or body (different externalpath, positive and or negative effect), Qm effect (quantumpath), only seemed to be a cidentireplica (the differences are so small it takes a long time to diverge) in reality we can never know for sure if a person is a cidentireplica of another person. We can only know for certain by definition.
Taking an experiment from each one of these we have: Imagine taking a cidentireplica and modifying his environment (change in the sensepath).
Externalpath Negative change (injury) injuries happen all the time to people that do not happen to other people or to the original. Positive change intentional positive change Natural, by design intentional, and by accident unintentional
The qm effect. Quantumpath is the path of random change that occurs over time to a physipath.
Things that effect the physipath deterministicpath --- deterpath it determines the path that the body would follow over time with no external change and no Quantum random probabilities changes structure
Not being exact to begin with. The idea that no state is well defined.
Prediction(s)/Difference in theories: This is one of the things that make the cidentireplica differnt from the original it can have a divergent physipath and thus awarepath from that of the original at any time.
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle #5.1 Citodivergence: A cidentireplica can diverge from the functioning and mentality of the originals in numerous ways. When it does diverge it becomes a videntireplica. If the conditions for a cidentireplica are different at some point in the life of the cidentireplica it can diverge physically and mentally from how it would have been.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT: The functioning of a cidentireplica can diverge but if they diverge enough they will have a variation in consciousness and if there is enough variation in consciousness there will be a change in the ixpereincit.
CAM/VT analogy Citodivergence: Any number of things can happen to each movie to make it some how different. Like scratches etc. Each movie could have a differnt type of divergence or any number of copies of the same divergence
Subjective (ixperiencit) example: A cidentireplica is made identical to an original. The original goes home the cidentireplica is let go a few minutes later. The two do not have a synchronized awarepath because what is happening to one is not happening to the other at the same time. Having the same identical mentality to begin with the cidentireplica decides to go home also but the walk home is different for him-- different people are in the street. The sun light is a little different. A siren from a police car goes off the distance that did not happen for the original. He remembers that he has to pick up some bread for his wife for dinner. His awarepath is now different although a lot like the originals when he gets to the originals home he finds that he is not the original. The original is already there. He is a videntireplica of the original. And the converse the original is a variation of the videntireplica or a videntireplica of the actual videntireplica. If we now switch the two so that the environment was the same for the original as it was for the cidentireplica and visa versa the original will experience exactly what the videntireplica did in the first scenario. The original actually experiences what the videntireplica does and visa versa. but at a different stage in the in their awarepaths. This may seem strange how can the original have an awareness of what the cidentireplica has with out having any awareness of it? It would seem that because either one or the other od not have the same memories of this event they will not be the same person. It does have most of your exact memories and behavior.
An example of a negative change is the above example is the cidentireplica on the way home gets run over by a car it damages his brain. To begin with he is unconsciousness. Then the brain damage is evident. He can no longer read and has a number of other defects that the original does not have. It is more difficult to imagine a positive change occurring naturally but we are not limited to positive natural changes the positive change can occur by design. If the original (and now the cidentireplica) was vitamin deficient and the doctor, who knows about this runs into the cidentireplica but not the original on the way home. The addition of the vitamins might be a very positive divergence for the cidentireplica that the original does not get.
You are a cidentireplica of an original and your functioning gradually becomes different from the original. The way it happens is that in the normal course of events the only difference is that you see a small red dot in your field of view for one second that the originals does not experience. The red light stimulates part of your retina in a different way than the original’s retina is stimulated. At this point there are changes in the structure and functioning of you body so you are no longer a cidentireplica of the original. Your functioning has diverged and if you mentally registers this red dot your consciousness is different than the originals.
Not being exact and the qm effect might be synonymous to begin with The uncertainty principle says that we can not be certain if two bodies are identical or not, because we can not have all of the information about a system at one time any way (Uncertainty principle) What happens is that internally the two diverge on their own even if the sensepath is identical for each. But even if internally the two are diverging this doe not mean there is enough physical change to produce a change in the mentality or mentapath.
There are a number of different videntireplicas that will have the same consciousness as that of the original. This is because there are a number of different very small changes that will not effect the way that the videntireplica functions. There are a number of videntireplicas that are so close to the original
Why/how Important?:
Oriconvergence
Discussion:
Question(s): Can the original’s physipath and awarepath become more like certain other peoples awarepaths and physipaths? Or exactly like them? If two physipaths converge will they have the same awarepath? Will they have the same ixperiencit?
Definition: Oriconvergence this is the concept that awarepaths and physipath can converge toward and into the physipath and awarepath of the original.
Experiment set #5.2 Oriconvergence:
Oriconvergence is the concept that two or more different originals that have different functionings and structures, made of different matter, in a different space, and possibly in a different time, can have their functioning and structure converge. There are many different ways that this can happen. One can stay relatively the same and the other can become more like the first one. Both can become like each other. The sensepath, the enviropath, internapath including the qpath, can all be factors that produce this convergence. This convergence can be produced naturally or by accident, deliberately creating an accident, deliberately but randomly or deliberately with know how. This process can happen over any period of time from as instantaneous as physically possible to the life time of the originals. There are several different experiments that can be created. First, when two or more different originals are forced to or are observed converging in structure and functioning, and we can plot what consciousness they produce over time. we can see if the principle is correct. If the consciousnesses converge we have proved this principle. Not all converging change in structure and functioning will produce converging consciousnesses this can be studied as well. So we can run experiments where one or more aspects of structure and functioning is converging and all the other stay the same. We can also converge one or more aspects of consciousness and see how this effects functioning and structure.
Prediction(s)/Difference in theories: If two differnt physipaths converge they will have the same awarepath and the same ixpereincit. If the original’s physipath converges to any other physipath then it will have the same consciousness and ixperiencit. They will not be the same person.
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Oriconvergence:When we have two different originals that are converging in their functioning and structure there comes a point when their consciousness will converge as well. If two different originals converge in their structure and functioning they will produce the same consciousness while they have the same functioning and structure.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Oriconvergence:
Subjective (ixperiencit) example: You can become more like other originals over time. For instance your behavior, consciousness, thoughts, feelings, memories, personality , experiences, emotions, etc. All the originals will think, when they converge, that they will be you. In fact before they converge but are close to converging they will think they are you the same person, Even though they are not aware of each other .
Why/how Important?:
Citoconvergence
Discussion:
Question(s): Can two or more differnt physipaths converge to become cidentriplicas of each other? After converging will they have the same awarepath and ixperiencit?
Definition:
Experiment set # Citoconvergence:
Citoconvergence is the term used when a grouping of matter, structure and functioning (consciousness body) becomes closer and closer to becoming identical in functioning and structure to a designated original. Citoconvergence is the opposite concept as citodivergence. It is where a videntireplica becomes a cidentireplica.
How is citoconvergence possible? The original and cidentireplica are always changing since they are different bodies or conscious systems they do not have to continue to function identically beyond any point. Materially, In many cases what is destroyed can be repaired or what is done can be undone. If a external source produced a change in the cidentireplica an external change can repair that difference. Random divergence is more likely than uniformity, but there comes a point where the change is just as likely to be like another object than differ from it
cover Sensepath convergence senpath External path convergence Quantum path convergence Qupath deterministic convergence -- deterpath convergence
Stable systems where changes revolve around certain specific parameters. A rock is stable for long periods of time. The functioning of the body does not change into a rock rapidly. it revolves around a certain type of functioning neurons firing etc.
If a cidentireplica diverged from identical functioning of the original it can then converge back to having identical functioning.
What is the proof that a citodivergent cidentireplica can converge back to the functioning and consciousness of the original. We can show ways that the physipaths can converge. When the physipaths converge the mentapaths converge. There is nonphysical that says that two different bodies can not have the same physipath.
Subjectively, Imagine the example above with the red dot every. Everything is held the same after the flash of red light, so all future experiences are exactly the same for the originals and the citodivergent cidentireplica. If this change to the functioning is small enough it effect my not reverberate through the brain making larger and larger differences between the functioning of the original and former cidentireplica. Now imagine right as you are about to thing about this event a traumatic even occurs This event occurs to both you and the original. This traumatic event is powerful enough that the changes that are occurring in the brain of the former cidentireplica that are different from the originals are stimulated over so that the functioning of the former cidentireplica in now becoming like the originals. The effect of the red light is fading rapidly with time. So the cidentireplica saw the red light and experienced the red light but now has no memory of every having this experience. Nor will it every have a future effect on its consciousness or functioning. The behavior and memory of the citoconvergent cidentireplica you will be as if this never happened.
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle # 5.2 Citoconvergence: people’s physipaths, mentapaths, awarepaths and knowlepath can become more alike over time for many different reasons. A videntireplica can become a cidentireplica many different ways.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: The soul does not converge even if the consciousness or awarepath does. The newly created cidentireplica of the original will have a differnt soul or no soul at all. CST: NST: SMT:
MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citoconvergence:
Subjective (ixperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Orimultivergence
Discussion:
Question(s): Can physipaths awarepaths and ixpereincits converge and diverge multiple times?
Definition: Orimultivergence is the term for multi convergence or divergence at one or many points
Experiment set Orimultivergence:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence: There are external ways to change how the physipath functions. These changes can be naturally or purposefully produced.
Principle of Orimultivergence: Different physipaths can converge and diverge many times at many places on the physipath. As a result the awarepaths will become the same and then diverge as well.
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Orimultivergence: Many differnt movies can be played at the same time they can become identical at points before they diverge to latter become the same as a differnt movie.
Subjective (uxperiencit) example: You poke yourself in the hand the cidentireplica of you does not.
Why/how Important?:
Citomultivergence
Discussion: The physipath of a cidentireplica that diverges from the awarepath o
Question(s): Can the physipaths of cidentireplicas converge toward and diverge from themselves and
Definition: Citomultivergence is the term for
Experiment set Citomultivergence:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citomultivergence:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citomultivergence:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Orisimiconvergence
Discussion: If physipath can totally converge they can also partially converge.
Question(s): Can physipath and awarepath totally or partially converge?
Definition: Orisimiconvergence is the term for partial convergence of the original’s physipath toward some other physipath or some other physipath partially converging toward the original’s physipath. And how this effects the awarepath involved.
Experiment set Orisimiconvergence:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Orisimiconvergence: The awarepath and physipath of the original can partially converge to other
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: partial convergence is not really dwells on
SMT: We may share expereinces to some degree but it is not in any way a partial form of immortality for the original or visa versa.
MMT: It can be a case of partial conscious existence for the original
CAM/VT analogy Orisimiconvergence: Consider the movie “life of the original” and a different movie of your choice. There are many differnt parts of the two movies that are differnt. Now lets consider the face of the original and the face of the hero in the other movie. Imagine the two faces becomming more and more alike until they look exactly alike. This is an example of two parts of the movie converging.
Subjective (uxperiencit) example: Imagine having a feeling and that feeling becomes identical to someone elses When you are watching a beautiful sunset with a friend you maybe having a converging expereince
Why/how Important?:
Citosimiconvergence
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Citosimiconvergence is the term for
Experiment set Citosimiconvergence:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citosimiconvergence:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citosimiconvergence:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Orisimidivergence
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Orisimidivergence is the term for
Experiment set Orisimidivergence:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Orisimidivergence:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
VHS analogy Orisimidivergence:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Citosimidivergence
Discussion:
Question(s):
Definition: Citosimidivergence is the term for
Experiment set Citosimidivergence:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citosimidivergence:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citosimidivergence:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Orisimimultivergence
Discussion:
Question(s): Can the original’s physipath converge partially to many differnt physipaths at the same time? Can the original’s physipath diverge partially to many differnt physipath at the same time?
Definition: Orisimimultivergence is the term for the study of simiconvergence and simidivergence of the originals awarepath and physipath.
Experiment set Orisimimultivergence:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Orisimimultivergence:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Orisimimultivergence:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?:
Citosimimultivergence
Discussion:
Question(s): Can many different physipaths partially converge and diverge at many places on the originals physipath? What will the consciousness and ixpereincit of these differnt physipaths?
Definition: Citosimimultivergence is the term for the concept that simipaths can converge and diverge at many different points on a physipath. and awarepath of the cidentireplica.
Experiment set Citosimimultivergence:
Prediction(s))/Difference in theories:
Proof(s)/supporting evidence:
Principle of Citosimimultivergence:
Type of immortality, TCE, DMF /Difference in theories: SST, CST, NST, SMT, MMT: SST: CST: NST: SMT: MMT:
CAM/VT analogy Citosimimultivergence:
Subjective (uxperiencit) example:
Why/how Important?: