Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Expeinconsistencies

From Aware Theory

Expeinconsistencies are seen when the results of experiments are either unexpected of do not follow from the predicted form. For example, you mix baking soda and vinegar over and over changing the conditions, like temperature, volume, percentage of ingredients, etc. and you have a nice continuum of results where a little change in starting conditions produce a small change in the results. But now you have a situation where at exactly 50 degrees C. the mixture explodes violently. At 49 degrees it does not explode and at 51 degrees it does not explode. The current theory does not explain this result. you have an unexplained expeinconsistency.

The same thing can occur in experesultcontinuum dealing with the ixpepath produced by an expepath in an expecontinuum.

There are many possible examples. If we consider an expecontinuum produced by restoration experiments and find that at ten days after death when we restore the original's structure and functioning rather than having the originals ixperiencitness we have a different ixperiencitness. But yet at day eleven etc, we have or reproduce the original's ixperiencitness we have an unexplained Expeinconsistencies. The reason that it is unexplained is because we have no reasons why there is this difference in the experimental result. If you had this result you would assume that the experiment was flawed in some way. If however, the experiment always gave the same result then there is something lacking in the theory because it does not explain this result.

There can be explained Expeinconsistencies.

See also itoboundaries, itoanomalies, itoinconsistencies, itodiscontinuities, expeboundaries, expeanomalies, expeinconsistencies, expediscontinuities, itoexpeboundaries, itoexpeanomalies, itoexpeinconsistencies, and itoexpediscontinuities