Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Extension experiments arguments

From Aware Theory

Extension experiments arguments are arguments for superimmortality based on extensions of the physapath of a body after death. The body of a person frequently exists after the death of the body. But this is not always the case when fires and explosions are involved. What experimental conditions applied to the original dead body will extend the ixperiencitness that the original body produced before death? One needed factor is returning the original body to life. The body degrades after death. This degradation has to be stopped. The colder the temperature the dead body is kept at the slower the degradation is. But freezing of the body produces damage to the cells in the body. The cell membranes can rip apart leaving holes in the cells upon defrosting or unfreezing the body.

What experimental results can show that the original again is conscious after death? We do not know for certain who is conscious but we usually believe that if you act like you are alive and conscious then there is a good chance that you are alive and conscious.

How do we experimentally know that the original's ixperiencitness is being produced again after death of the original body by the restored original body? If the original body had not died there would have been one physapath produced by this body producing an awarepath. If this physapath did not diverge to much from its original structure and functioning it is likely the ixperiencitness produced by this body would have continued to be the same.


Existence argument for this physasection extension argument. Existence argument for there being many different physasections that are different from the way the physasection would have been that still has the same ixperiencitness. Closely identical physasections should produce the same consciousness and ixperiencitness. Different physasections will produce

Existence argument for there being many different physasections that are different from the way the physasection would have been that will not produce the same ixperiencitness.