Fazarguments

The Fazconcepts are the physiconcept, physaconcept, awareconcept, mentaconcept, ixpeconcept, and epiconcept. Any arguments or proofs dealing with these concepts are fazarguments.

Some proposals are so obvious that they do not seem to require a named, official, designated argument. it depends on a person's view point as to what they take to be true without proof such as happens with mathematical axioms or linguistic tautologies. Sometimes all that is required is a definition. For instance, an awarepath is the name for the total conscious awareness for the life time of a person or other conscious being. The existence proof for awarepaths would be the actual empirical proving that they exist. But if you understand the definition you know what an awarepath is intuitively in terms of your own personel experience and need no scientific proof for its existence. If you have an understanding of science, the concepts of physipath and physapath for a person does not need any thing but a good understandable definition as well. The epiconcept is straight forward as well if you understand the ideas that there can be knowledge about objects and concepts. the epipath is just knowledge about the other types of fazpaths. the concepts of the mentapath and ixpepath are more complicated to define.

Some more complicated fazconcepts are that the same physapath will always produce the same awarepath. Or that many different physipaths can produce the same awarepath. There are many different arguments for these concepts. Some are based on logic, some on science, some on experimental evidence. The best arguments for a particular proposal or theory will combine all the evidence that is available into a coherent system of knowledge.