Identical knowledge argument

The "Identical knowledge argument" is that idoriginals, cidentireplicas, videntireplicas, enhaidentireplicas, can have identical knowledge to that of their corresponding originals. Idoriginals and cidentireplicas will have identical physapaths thus they will have identical neuropaths, and behaviorpaths to their originals.

It has been argued that to have the same memories or knowledge of past life events or experiences you need to have experienced them. But a cidentireplica, by definition, will produce the same physapath as the original so it will also produce the same behaviorpath as does the original no matter when, where, or with what specific matter, how, or why, the cidentireplicas is created with. It may be possible that a cidentireplica of some original is impossible to create, But his does not mean that we can not gain useful information about these potential occurrences or experiments anyway.

The science of superimmortality predicts that a cidentireplica will have the same awarepath and ixpepath as does the original that it has an identical physapath to. A cidentireplica will not have the same physipath to that of the original. The physipath is different from that of the physapath. The physipath contains all the physical properties of the physical body, where are the physapath deals with the structure and functioning of the body. The physapath of a body is a part of the physipath of a body.

convergent and divergent physapaths