Itoextension arguments
More actions
Itoextension arguments are rational scientific arguments for and against itoextension based on actual experiments where ever possible or coherent rational experiments where the actual experiments can not be performed yet.
Since there are many aspects of itoextension there will be many different arguments for each aspect.
Some of these aspects are:
The argument for simplicity for itoextension is that a very simple explanation for how itoextension works, that is coherent with science, is better than a complex theory.
Adding the concept of a soul or the equivalent is making a more complex theory. As is making the specific matter, space, or time important factors. Continuity of matter or consciousness are two more complicating factors. One might say that if these are complicating specific factors then including the concept of structure and functioning is much more complex than all the other concepts combined. This is true, but to have a system of knowledge that deals with an extremely complex system with enumerable possible outcomes somewhere there has to be a part of the system that can generate the appropriate predictive complexity. The concept of itoextension can be stated in a very simple fashion approximate the structure and functioning of a conscious being any time before death in a itobody any time after death with any matter at any place, and you approximate the consciousness and ixperiencitness of the original. If you exactly duplicate the structure and functioning over a period of time then you exactly duplicate the consciousness and ixperiencitness over that period of time.
A simply stated concept for an extremely complex system.
The argument for coherence for itoextension Others theories of life after death are incoherent with science. For instance any theory that has to use a soul concept or equivalent is not scientific even though the arguments may be logical, because the concept of a soul is not scientific. A theory can postulate an infinite amount of concepts, but if they do not exist in some scientific way, they cannot be used in a scientific theory. Any soul inclusive theory that uses the existence of a soul as a necessary part of it will be pseudo scientific until souls can actually be scientifically studied.
Specific matter theories of life after death cannot specify what properties of matter are necessary for a continuation of the self. It comes down to answering this question: Why is it scientifically necessary to have the same matter, or a specific sequence of matter to produce the same ixperiencitness?
Continuity or continuance of consciousness theories do not have the answers either. The problem comes down to: Why do you have to have continuance or continuity of consciousness for a body to produce the same ixperiencitness?
Itofazextension arguments are supporting evidence and logical, rational, and scientific reasons for accepting or believing that Itofazextension exists as a useful concept in many different ways, and how it applies to and can be used for the understanding of consciousness, ixperiencitness, life after death, other ideas in awaretheory, and other applicable topics.
Itofazcontinuance arguments, Itocontinuance arguments, Fazcontinuance arguments,
Itofazextension arguments, Itoextension arguments, Fazextension arguments,
Itofazcontinuity arguments, Itocontinuity arguments, Fazcontinuity arguments,
Itofazdiscontinuity arguments, Itodiscontinuity arguments, Fazdiscontinuity arguments,
Itofazidentity arguments, Itoidentity arguments, Fazidentity arguments,
Itofazsimidentity arguments, Itosimidentity arguments, Fazsimidentity arguments,
Itofazsimicontinuance arguments, Itosimicontinuance arguments, Fazsimicontinuance arguments,
Itofazsimiextension arguments, Itosimiextension arguments, Fazsimiextension arguments,
Itofazsimicontinuity arguments, Itosimicontinuity arguments, Fazsimicontinuity arguments,