Justice 1
More actions
File name: justice Date: 02/18/09 12:42:55 AM
What is justice when we take into account the itotheory? We have to take into account the concepts of potential and actual awaremoments. What appears to be justice from one perspective can be just the opposite from another because of limited perspective or bias.
The concept that you are the current consciousness -- you are the awaremoment The ixperiencit concept is defined in terms of this awaremoment. Locally justice is determined by the awaremoment perspective not the larger potential awarecontinuum's perspective. We do not even consider the awarepath perspective in many situations when we consider justice.
When is something unjust? We can have injustice applied to either a person or a group of people or any conscious being. With out consciousness involved there is no justice or lack of it.
If life is terrible in the sense that most of the awarecontinuum is not good for a particular ixperiencit's grouping does this mean that the universe is not just. Or what if over all the awarepaths in the awarecontinuum is negative for most awarepaths does this mean that there is little justice in the universe? Immortality like the itotheory purposes makes justice very different then if there is no life after death or no possibility of life after death for an individual that is treated unjustly in this life his only life. A bad person having a good life at the expense of good people may seem unjust but when we consider that this bad person may have many versions that in fact good can change what we think. And visa versa if a good person having a difficult or unjust life here should have many more actual version that are bad does this even out. Since there is always the possibility of evening the score so to speak in the future either with bad or good versions of a particular awarevenue this seem to even the score. There is also the factor of the creation of good or bad awarepaths being produced that never effect reality. For instance, Hitler's awarepath produced in an awarepaducer. Does the good produced in an awarepaducer or visa versa the bad produced in an awarepaducers count for or against a person?
The fact that this theory does not guarantee life after death or immortality but allows it add a different perspective to morals and justice.
You can actually be both the bad person and the good person at the same time in two or more people actual people and you can be both the oppressor of the sufferer at the same time. Believing that you are versions of each can be in reality true or false.
Under certain circumstances you can be the bad person and do no bad to others as when your awarepath is produced in an awarepaducer that does not effect other people. In the same way ones good deeds can be towards no one as well in an awarepaducer.
Since what you do can be in an awarepaducer and not be affecting others doing good deed that make you suffer may no t be the best thing to do. We have no way of determining how likely the awarepath you are experiencing is artificially produced or not