Multiple continuous partial itofazpaths existence proofs
More actions
Multiple continuous partial itofazpaths existence proofs Each type of continuous partial itofazpaths can have it own set of proofs based on the actual existence of of the specific types of continuous partial itofazpaths.
The most important aspect of the Multiple continuous partial itofazpaths existence proofs is the proof of the existence of different itobodies that can have the different or variations in the continuous partial itofazpaths and still have the same ixperiencitness. Each type of itobody can have its own proofs. We will concentrate on the human aspect but the other types of itobodies proofs will be approximately the same.
How can you prove or show supporting evidence that for most if not all ixperiencitnesses there are many different versions of their respective awarepaths that have different continuous partial itofazpaths but can still have the same ixperiencitness?
One proof is based on the sensepath. How much can the sensepath be different before it changes the ixperiencitness? The sensepath effects how the brain functions That can in turn change the structure of the brain which again can change the way the brain functions. This process can cycle and be reinforced by the sensepath. Eventually it could change the structure and functioning of the brain to the point that there is a different ixperiencitness produced by the brain.
Many continuous partial itofazpaths are produced or changed by the sensepath. The relationship itofazpath, bodykind itofazpath, laborkind itofazpath, and envirokind itofazpath, are directly linked to the sensepath. If a sensepath is so unusual or traumatic with the potential to be reinforced it is possible that the resulting consciousness has a different ixperiencitness.
The proof can be broken into two parts the first is one with one orifazpath and the other is with different orifazpath produced by different oribodies. Since you are an original we will consider you. What changes in your sensepath will change your neuropath and resulting awarepath so much that it no longer produces the same ixperiencitness? You might believe that no changes will ever change the ixperiencitness that your body produced as long as it is functioning normally. It is said that you can be scared to death which is the end of the ixperiencitness that, the body is producing. This is not an example of the change of the ixperiencitness.
Since ixperiencitness is a continuum like concept like consciousness it is not a case that an ixperiencitness turns into a completely different ixperiencitness. It can be a gradual change, and it is very likely that most human ixperiencitnesses are percentage wise equal to other human ixperiencitness.
We can use a counting and evaluation argument because we do not have to prove that every different sensepath will produce an awarepath with a different ixperiencitness we only have to show that there are a very large amount of awarepaths We can do this by using itofazelaboration, itofazapproximation and itofazextrapolation. We use itofazelaboration to define as well as needed an awarepath and, or physapath. Then use itofazelaboration, again to define another awarepath and, or physipath that is not disputed as a possible path for the original or you. This can be done by using itofazapproximation where the awarepath or physapath that is imagined is not too different from the first one. Then itofazextrapolation can be used to show many different version that are between the two. An example is imagine what you will do in the next hour. Now imagine another real possibility that you could do instead. Now imagine all the possible variation that can be considered in between the two physipath or awarepaths. There are aspects of the awarepath that will not be different between the two versions. And then there will be aspects that are discrete and other that have a smooth continuum of variation. You could read awaretheory for the next hour or you could go eat lunch now with the relavant experiences. One itofazextrapolation variable might be postponing the time that you go to eat lunch, keeping most other variables the same. Changing the time can change other variables like lighting from the sun, things that other people change etc. we can imagine and count change after small change in the awarepath and physapath. We can do this process for as long as is needed to show that the desired number of variations that can exist with the same ixperiencitness. What is the criterion for what is needed to change the ixperiencitness. Most small changes do not meet any criterion for a change in the ixperiencitness.