Physimatrix existence proof
More actions
Physimatrix existence proof is the itoproof or itoargument and itoevidence from physimatrix experiments that a physimatrix can exist. It does not have to prove that it produces an awarematrix with the same ixperiencitness as the original's awarepath. It is however one of first steps in the proof.
Physimatrix existence proof does not have to prove every case in a physimatrix continuum it only has to show that it is not irrational to consider the combination in one case then use inductive process to show the rationality of the process for other physimatrix cases.
It is conceivable to imagine two physimoments as part of a continuous sequence in a single physisection containing just these two physimoments. This is not an irrational idea. We now can imagine one of these physimoments being produced by the original and the second physimoment produced by a cidentireplica of this original. The cidentireplica by other evidence has the same consciousness and ixperiencitness as the original so the cidentireplica's awaremoment forms a continuation of the original's previous awaremoment.
This example uses just two awaremoments in just one instance. An actual physimatrix will combine an extremely large amount of physimoments or physisections from many physipaths in space and time to produce many matrix produced physipaths, thus produce many matrix produced awarepaths that did not or could not exist before.
see also physamatrix, physamanifold, awarematrix, awaremanifold, itomatrix, itomanifold, combining awarespaces combining physaspaces
Awarematrix construction proof
Physamatrix existence proof a physamatrix is not as constrained as the physimatrix because physaspaces are not as constrained as physispaces. This is because physipaths are supposed to require more of the same identical physical attributes, such as being made of the same matter, than physapaths are.