Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Science of conscious existence

From Aware Theory

Awaretheory deals with many areas of the science of conscious existence. Awaretheory appears to be applying many new ideas to the creation of the science of conscious existence. Psychexistology is one name that has been proposed for a science of conscious existence. One of the applications of a science of conscious existence is making the scientific study of life after death an immortality a real science and not a pseudoscience. There are many scientific goals that awaretheory proposes for this science. For instance, itofazmapping itofazpaducer construction principles, itofazmathematics, and itofazcontinuum construction principles. Each of these named topics are grouping names for many complex sub topics.

Other names for sciences dealing with areas dealing with conscious existence are awarepathology, mentapathology, physapathology

Just about any major concept in awaretheory that has a well defined scientific meaning and the appropriate complexity can be named simply by placing a "ology" as a suffix at the end of the word or a shortened version of the word. It still has to have a nice sound to it however, and a rather simple pronunciation scheme. why might we need new names for new sciences? If we actually study all of the possible consciousnesses that can be produced and all of the differnt ways that they can be produced we have the most complex set of sciences that have ever existed. What would you call a science that studies potential and or actual alien consciousness and how to produce them? What would you call the science that studies fidentireplicas and all of the types of consciousnesses that they can produce? What should we call the science that studies all of the enhanced consciousnesses that have the same ixperiencitnesses? Should the scientists that produce awarepaducers have a name for their scientists? What about the epistemologists that create epipaducers?